Sunday, July 11, 2010

Leather Engraved Bracelet From Disney

DVR-recover 0.6

Again there is a new version of DVR-recover, but this has yet to come ... or not.

  2010-07-11 Stefan Haller   version 0.6: *   DVR recover.py : Binary operations simplified. *  DVR recover.py : Fixed bug throwing exception "__main__.SqlManagerError: multiple chunks are referencing the same chunk for concatenating". * Readme  : "Tuning" section added. 

noticed some users, that has crept into the last edition, a small error. This error, however, had a major impact, since it allows you to restore only a very limited scale of the files.

is further known that IsoBuster apparently in a position that disk image to read in part. However, this is also limited. As long as there is a need for my script, I'll try to manage the project and umzustetzen all desired features. IsoBuster Even if all data would be able to read successfully: IsoBuster is shareware and costs 29.95 USD. A free opportunity as has my yes its advantages;)

I personally think that Panasonic used as a kind of UDF file system. After all, IsoBuster is able to open the dump is. The block size of 2048 bytes would support my thesis. Moreover, it would be logical, because the recorder data would have to write to DVD convert not only because they are about to be available in the appropriate format. Some other people also agree. But will still not be an arrangement to the recording information. Presumably, the structure of the disk as follows (figures, of course, no guarantee, just a guess on my part):

  • firmware
  • Table of Contents (information about the recording, date, sender, ...)
  • UDF-like file system layout

There are moves the file system to investigate. I'm also interested. In the meantime, you can save with my script pretty well the recordings. If you would know, of course, the file system exactly, you could play back the recording at a rate of 100% ... : D

My script is here not at the approach of the file system. Therefore, it is maybe not completely reliable and some images are not displayed. However, I think that the default setting for the parameter "min_chunk_size" is set too high. One I can no longer fine-tune properly I possess not a reflection of the hard disk anymore. If someone can show, however, that a small default would be better, then I would reduce the default settings in the coming releases.

At the point, I refer to the place on the Internet, where one can buy probably the most information about the subject: A thread in AVS Forum . There has also begun the development of my script and is also advanced substantially. There

0 comments:

Post a Comment